Quick Comparison

Arize PhoenixHelicone
Best For Teams needing full-stack observability, model performance metrics, and OTel integration.High-QPS LLM API teams needing low-latency proxy to capture prompts, responses, and usage metrics.
Pricing Free tier availableFree tier available
Winner Our Pick

Tool Breakdown

Overall Winner
A

Arize Phoenix

Best for most teams needing end-to-end observability and model metrics via OTel-native stack.

What it does well
  • OTel-native integration for traces, metrics, and logs
  • Rich model-level metrics and visualization for drift, errors, and performance
  • Designed for production monitoring and alerting across deployments
Watch out for
  • Not optimized as lightweight gateway for extremely high QPS capture
  • Requires OTel pipeline and storage setup (infra work)
Best For Teams needing full-stack observability, model performance metrics, and OTel integration.
Pricing Free tier available
H

Helicone

Open-source LLM observability gateway built for high-throughput request capture and lightweight telemetry export.

What it does well
  • High-throughput gateway designed to handle lots of LLM requests
  • Low-latency request capture and request-level telemetry
  • Easy to drop in front of LLM APIs to log prompts/responses
Watch out for
  • Limited built-in model-level analytics and visualizations
  • Needs external observability system (e.g., Arize or Grafana) for deep analysis
Best For High-QPS LLM API teams needing low-latency proxy to capture prompts, responses, and usage metrics.
Pricing Free tier available

Frequently Asked Questions

Which tool is better for production model monitoring? +

Arize Phoenix is better for production model monitoring because it provides OTel-native traces, model metrics, drift detection, and alerting; use Helicone only if you need extreme gateway throughput first.

Can I run Helicone as gateway and send data to Arize Phoenix? +

Yes — use Helicone to capture high-QPS requests and forward telemetry/logs to Arize Phoenix (or another OTel consumer) for model metrics and deeper analysis.

How hard and costly to switch between them? +

Both are open-source so switching low-cost technically, but Arize needs OTel pipeline and storage setup while Helicone is lightweight to deploy; hosted tiers may incur costs as volume grows.