Ashby vs Greenhouse: Which ATS Is Better for You in 2026?
Quick Comparison
| Ashby | Greenhouse | |
|---|---|---|
| Best For | Data-driven startups and scale-ups (roughly 50-1,000 employees) that want modern analytics and transparent entry pricing. | Larger, process-heavy organizations (typically 250+ employees) that need a defined, structured hiring methodology across many interviewers. |
| Pricing | No free trial — demo and proof-of-concept only; Foundations $400/mo (up to 100 employees), Plus/Enterprise custom | Custom pricing (contact sales) — Core / Plus / Pro tiers |
| Winner | Our Pick |
Tool Breakdown
Ashby
For startups and scale-ups (roughly 50-1,000 employees) that want modern, configurable analytics and transparent entry-level pricing rather than a quote-only enterprise sales process, Ashby is the faster and more predictable platform to adopt.
- Consolidates ATS, sourcing CRM, and configurable analytics into a single fast-moving platform, frequently cited by reviewers as the top reason teams switch from Greenhouse
- Transparent entry-level pricing — Foundations starts at $400/mo for up to 100 employees, versus Greenhouse's fully custom quotes
- Modern, AI-forward product velocity, with frequent feature releases relative to legacy ATS platforms
- No self-serve free trial — evaluating Ashby means a sales-led demo and proof-of-concept, then signing an annual contract
- Plus and Enterprise tiers (101+ employees) are fully custom-quoted, so the transparent-pricing advantage narrows at larger scale
- No public content-affiliate program — its Referral Program is restricted to existing Ashby customers, with no disclosed commission rate
Greenhouse
Greenhouse is a structured-hiring ATS with scorecards, approval chains, and the deepest pre-built integration library in the category, used by more than 7,000 companies.
- Enforces consistent structured hiring through scorecards, interview kits, and defined hiring plans across every stage
- 372+ pre-built integrations, the deepest library among major ATS platforms, per Greenhouse's own published integration count
- Pro tier adds enterprise security controls, audit logs, and a developer sandbox for larger IT and compliance requirements
- Fully custom, quote-based pricing across all three tiers (Core/Plus/Pro) — no public rate card, so budgeting requires a sales conversation
- No self-serve free trial or free tier — demo-only signup
- Content-affiliate program is not self-serve — only a revenue-share program for solution/integration partners, with no disclosed flat commission
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Ashby cheaper than Greenhouse? +
At the entry tier, yes — Ashby publishes a $400/mo Foundations price for up to 100 employees, while Greenhouse is fully custom-quoted for its equivalent Core tier and can run into five figures annually for a similarly sized org. But Ashby's own Plus and Enterprise tiers above 100 employees are also custom-quoted, so the transparent-pricing advantage is really an early-stage-startup advantage, not a company-wide guarantee.
Can I try either ATS for free before buying? +
No. Neither Ashby nor Greenhouse offers a self-serve free trial; both require a sales-led demo, and Ashby specifically layers a proof-of-concept stage before you sign an annual contract. Budget time for a sales process with either tool rather than expecting to self-serve your way to a decision.
Which ATS has better integrations? +
Greenhouse, on raw integration count — it lists 372+ pre-built integrations, the deepest library among major ATS platforms, per its own published figures. Ashby's integration ecosystem is smaller but still covers the major sourcing, calendar, and HRIS tools most scaling teams need, and its faster product velocity means new integrations ship regularly.